Note that the last comment was somewhat in just. Actually, on reviewing the CSS 2.0 specification, it is true that if browsers implemented it propery, it could be "good enough" for a check template (it supports a page box model similar to LaTeX, but most browsers probably don't support this much if at all).
However, the fact remains, there is "good enough" and there is "the best." I doubt we will ever find anything "better" than LaTeX regardless of what else we choose to support. The typography is likely to be better, and I think that for businesses that want *really nice, typographically correct* documents, there is simply no substitute. Therefore, my personal feeling is that even with XML/XSLT (aside from converting to LaTeX and a template library, which is likely to be a supported path), LaTeX for layout and templating will still probably be the preferred higher-end solution. Just my $0.02. Chris Travers ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
