"Higher-end" meaning that other solutions would be available to fill a more mass-marked requirement for those who want them,
Best Wishes Chris Travers On 3/19/07, Chris Travers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note that the last comment was somewhat in just. > > Actually, on reviewing the CSS 2.0 specification, it is true that if > browsers implemented it propery, it could be "good enough" for a check > template (it supports a page box model similar to LaTeX, but most > browsers probably don't support this much if at all). > > However, the fact remains, there is "good enough" and there is "the best." > > I doubt we will ever find anything "better" than LaTeX regardless of > what else we choose to support. The typography is likely to be > better, and I think that for businesses that want *really nice, > typographically correct* documents, there is simply no substitute. > Therefore, my personal feeling is that even with XML/XSLT (aside from > converting to LaTeX and a template library, which is likely to be a > supported path), LaTeX for layout and templating will still probably > be the preferred higher-end solution. > > Just my $0.02. > > Chris Travers > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
