On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Adam Thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2010-Feb-28 17:12, Chris Travers wrote:
> Since you asked so nicely :-) > > I think you should continue to use the PGDATABASE environment variable > throughout, since LSMB_INSTALL_DB already indicates whether or not the > database should be, um, "installed". (The only other word I can think > of is "provisioned" which is just as bad unless you work for a phone > company...) True. However, the tests are also designed to be runnable against a production db (for example to ensure that there are no overloaded functions, that the current functions work as advertised, etc). If we drop the LSMB_NEW_DATABASE variable, we would have to find some other way of flagging the database as one that is supposed to be created. Do you have an idea in mind for that? Best Wishes, Chris Travers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
