On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Adam Thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2010-Mar-01 11:00, Chris Travers wrote: >> If we drop the LSMB_NEW_DATABASE variable, we would have to find some >> other way of flagging the database as one that is supposed to be >> created. Do you have an idea in mind for that? > > I was actually thinking that the existence of LSMB_NEW_DB would be > sufficient. If it's not set and PGDATABASE is set instead, the database > will not get created. If PGDATABASE is set, (IIRC) 43-dbtest.t still runs.
Ok. But that's what we do now :-) Best wishes, Chris Travers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
