On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Adam Thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2010-Mar-01 18:13, Chris Travers wrote:
>>> I was actually thinking that the existence of LSMB_NEW_DB would be
>>> sufficient.  If it's not set and PGDATABASE is set instead, the database
>>> will not get created.  If PGDATABASE is set, (IIRC) 43-dbtest.t still runs.
>>
>> Ok.  But that's what we do now :-)
>
> Yes.  I just meant that between 40-dbsetup.t (& 43-dbtest.t) and
> 63-lwp.t, we have LSMB_NEW_DB and LSMB_NEW_DATABASE, which seems redundant.
>

Ok.  Great.  Will fix.

Best Wishes.,
Chris Travers

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel

Reply via email to