If the design of the GUI wouldn't have been such that I can mess up 3,000 transactions with one simple return, without entering any other actions/modifications in any field, and without LSMB asking me if I'm sure about affecting 3,000 transactions at one time, I might still have been using it. So, no, I'm afraid I can't contribute.
Thanks, ario On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:11:05 +0100 Erik Huelsmann <ehu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Maybe you're a happy or even long-time happy user of LedgerSMB. And > maybe you're mostly satisfied with the application. Satisfied enough > so you didn't have to interact much with the project. Not even to > file bug reports. > > If you are that user, then this question is probably for you! As they > say "Many hands make light work" and there's lots of work to be done > in the project! For those who shudder at the thought of having to > write code, fear not! There's a lot more to be done than writing code > and other complex "nerdy" stuff. > > Examples of smaller tasks: > * Contribute your testimonial to the website > * Write a review on SourceForge > * Add content suggestions to the project website > (http://ledgersmb.org) > * Sending your user-experience to the developers so we can improve > on it > > Examples of bigger tasks > * Translate the project to your language > * Document your workflows and publish them for others to benefit > > Of course there are lots of other tasks to be thought of as well. > > If every user spent 10 minutes every year giving to the project, our > task would get a lot lighter! So, this is a solicitation for > feedback: what do we need to do to enable you to spend 10 minutes on > LedgerSMB in 2016? > > > > Have a safe year-end and a happy and healthy 2016! > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-users mailing list Ledger-smb-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users