On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:32 AM, ledger-smb-users <
ledger-smb-us...@infopower.nl> wrote:

> > I appreciate your sensitivity on this but in the context of this
> > discussion, but in this context, feel free to discuss it.
>
> Good. It is ledger-cli. Written in C, and working surprisingly fast, it
> has a command line interface although there's also a fork, hledger,
> which can work with a browser GUI.
>

I have looked at Ledger-CLI because it was chosen as the basis for an open
source non-profit-oriented solution.

It is well done for what it does.   One of the impressions that I got from
it was that the direction we are moving, in the area of a clear separation
of mechanism from interface, is a good one and that is one thing that
LedgerCLI does very well (making it a very good for very small operations).

>
> It maintains a 'database' in text format with different files for
> payors/payees and for their commodities and their prices if you like to
> maintain those, and for the accounts of course. it's all plain readable
> and relations between the
> entities are clear and can easily be tracked down if needed.
>

Right.  It has to lock that so no concurrent access right?  I mean you can
have a server which serializes requests and enters them one at a time, but
you cannot have multiple readers and multiple writers at the same moment,
as I understand it.  So the design limitations are different. If it works
for you I won't be the one to bad mouth them or anything.  It's a good
program for what it does.

However it is worth noting what we can learn from them.

>
> Inputting is very fast and for repeating transactions you simple do a
> search/copy/paste in your text document and change the date.
>

I wonder how hard it woudl be to make a ledger-cli-compatible import
library for LSMB.  Not sure we could do the same tagging they do (our
tagging system is different) but for basic format stuff should be easy I
think.  I will add an enhancement item to do this.

>
> If the commodity's price has changed you put a new, time stamped, entry
> in the price list.
>
> It's not for people who have no clue of computers and are only windows
> GUI users, but for people like me, with some basic (and then some more)
> understanding of computers it's very useable.
>
> Reporting is quite comprehensive yet not straight forward, but here my
> litlle bit more-than-basic understanding of computers plays out quite
> well. Not to mention the free (as in free beer) support on the forum,
> irc channel where the main developer chimes in on a regular basis.
>
> Install is not straight forward but much less complicated than lsmb was.
>
> It's not an ERP but that's not what I need.
>
> I just need the expenses, income, stocks (oh, it does handle those also
> in an elegant manner--no 'warehouses' though), sales and
> receivables/payables and the reporting thereof, on a project basis.
>
> If you remember (it's years ago) the project based reporting was my
> main reason for starting with LSMB, but with ledger-cli that's covered
> as well now.
>
> However, before I leave this world, which won't be anytime soon if it
> were up to me, I'm sure I'll have to go back to something like LSMB for
> my successors to be able to continue the things I'm doing now with
> ledger, so I'm still interested in the developments.
> Hence my continued subscription to this list. :)
>

Thanks again for the discussion here.  It is worth seeing what we can learn
from them as well.

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

>
>
> > > > After all, we can't be everything to everybody, which means it's
> > > > definitely good to have alternatives to point people to.
> > >
> > > Right, it's no problem.
> > >
> > > > > By now probably things have changed in LSMB in that maybe there
> > > > > is a confirmation step now, but I'm sure I would find another
> > > > > way to do something seriously damaging to the database.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Actually, it would be very helpful, if you did that :-)
> > >
> > > Your sense of humour is appreciated. :)
> > >
> >
> > Actually almost every time we have seen this, it has prompted database
> > fixes, so seriously.....
> >
> > >
> > > > > Then there was the install procedure which was really some
> > > > > excercise in self-torture for a diy-er... I'm happy to hear that
> > > > > things are going to improve, or already have.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Right. There's a direct relation between this point and the
> > > > incorporation of Efficito, which offers a hosted  solution:
> > > > there's a direct relationship between the complexity of the setup
> > > > procedure and the desire to be not only an accounting system, but
> > > > also to integrate invoicing, with PDF invoices, open item
> > > > management, inventory management, fixed assets administration and
> > > > so on, with the ability to mail customers and vendors directly
> > > > from inside the system. (Although, granted, most users probably
> > > > most heavily use the accounting side.)
> > >
> > > I sense a tiny amount of friction here with the open source model if
> > > not 'home use' but understand the rationale.
> > >
> >
> > Well, Erik's sentence above covers a breathtaking scope in terms of
> > what we actually offer.
>
> Yes, and it's the combination of you offering an open source solution
> as well running a business based on it which made me hesitating
> mentioning the other sulution that I'm using now.
>
> > The setup complexity for a basic system for a given industry will
> > eventually get solved for some definition of "setup."  THis could be
> > done with vms or docker images, or better packaging.
>
> With 'better' packaging you probably mean 'faster'? I agree.
> VM Appliances would be an option, but not for me as I'm using Qubes OS,
> but Docker images could work also.
>
> > But if I
> > understand Erik's points above that's a minority really of what we
> > are talking about.
> >
> > First, people will want some new templates or the like.  Some of this
> > can be improved as well.  But design is design and that is not
> > something you can just drop in regardless of the technology used.
> >
> > But then we have things which are "setup" issues but are their own
> > disciplines.  If you are slightly larger, how do you tune
> > PostgreSQL?  Do you want backups?  An ability to restore to a point
> > in time if something goes badly?  Where are these stored?  Want
> > replication?  What then?
>
> With the ledger-cli I'm using git for that. :)
>
> > Then we get to emailing invoices.
>
> No need for that.
>
> > Here anti-spam best practices have
> > changed a lot in the last decade  Do you want to keep up with that?
>
> No.
>
> > Then there are other aspects.  Do you want training?
>
> No.
>
> > Or is
> > documentation and the email lists good enough?
>
> If comprehensive enough: Yes.
>
> > What about on-going
> > support?
>
> Well, of course. :)
>
> > There are a lot of people for whom these extra burdens of running a
> > system are really not very attractive.  That is effectively where
> > Efficito comes in.
>
> Fully understood.
>
> > Are we the only vendor here?  No.
> > Do we want to be the only vendor here?  No.
> > Do we want people to run LSMB at home?  Yes.
> > Are we here to help?  Yes.
> >
> > >
> > > > > Thanks for introducing me to accounting however, I learned a
> > > > > lot of this experience.-
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks again for following up on your original feedback! Happy and
> > > > prosperous 2016!
> > >
> > > And to you too.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks again!
>
> You're welcome. Thanks for the elaborate reply.
>
>
> ario
>
>
>
> > >
> > > ario
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Ledger-smb-users mailing list
> > > Ledger-smb-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Ledger-smb-users mailing list
> Ledger-smb-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
>



-- 
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

Efficito:  Hosted Accounting and ERP.  Robust and Flexible.  No vendor
lock-in.
http://www.efficito.com/learn_more
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-users mailing list
Ledger-smb-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users

Reply via email to