He came on for the last 20 minutes against Barnsley so that to me says he's fit - fit enough to be on the bench , fit enough to start. He was dropped. Just admit it mate, you're wrong. and to further the point. My complaint was always about Pugh being on the left of midfield. Why did Grayson drop him from that role last night and put him at left back if the Pugh / White combination was workign so well with Pugh in midfield ? Answer - it wasn't.
From: Richard Naef <[email protected]> To: 'Leeds List' <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, 30 November 2011, 17:50 Subject: Re: [LU] 4-0 Rich Walker gave his reason why Pugh didn't play; >Pugh was on the bench against Barnsley and came on. Sam was chosen in preference. Annoyingly Grayson gave his; "Pugh was not part of the sixteen players named by Leeds boss Simon Grayson for the game at Burnley and he is doubtful for the home game with Barnsley next Saturday. Grayson explained in an interview on Yorkshire Radio after the game, when he said, "He tweaked his hamstring in the Leicester game. He is responding to treatment but he is touch and go for next week." http://www.leeds.vitalfootball.co.uk/article.asp?a=262908 Rich then concluded; >In my book that says that he was fit so effectively dropped in preference to Sam ? Hmm, I know you are a new dad mate, but I'm not sure "the Hungry Caterpillar" is an appropriate reference book for professional football management ;) _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate
