> To try and help you, your argument is that Bates was responsible for last > night's result. My argument is that Redfearn was because of his team > selection (HE picked Pugh, not me, not Bates), and more importantly his > substitutions - specifically when Delph got injured and he put on Brown (NOT > Townsend). > > Can you understand that? Or are you going to respond with abuse as normal?
Who sacked Grayson? Bates did "a new managerial team will be able to get more out of the existing squad of players and make the difference" Who decided to give our youth team coach 4 games? Bates decided that Redfearn deserved a month's trial despite "a new managerial team will be able to get more out of the existing squad of players and make the difference" Bates decided he could save a month's wages for an entire management team by not appointing a full time manager. Therefore, the effects of that decision are Bates' fault. Bates owns and saved the club twice - he also got it relegated and put it into administration. Therefore he is ultimately responsible. He sacked a promising young manager and replaced him with an under qualified coach. His decision. He has failed to renew contracts for our best players and has allowed them to leave for very little. His decisions. He bluffs that he's spent £12M on player costs, and you swallow his lies - don't want another ridsdale, build the dream etc. You regularly point to Norwich and Swansea as examples. Norwich spent £12m on wages 2 years ago from a £17m turnover, Swansea spent £8m from a £10m turnover, our turnover is £30m. Defend the indefensible if you like but don't expect a positive reaction whilst you do. _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate
