I wouldn't have minded playing against him - biggest problem would have been back-ache helping the dozy bollox back to his feet 20 times a game! Am with Rich - unless he acquires some pace, control and pace again, he's not the answer. Glad he scored and all that, but....
________________________________ From: Richard Walker <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, 27 August 2012, 13:09 Subject: Re: [LU] 2 up Have you asked them? Sent from my iPad On 26 Aug 2012, at 14:18, [email protected] wrote: > They were not tap-ins. The first was a firm shot from 12 yards which the > keeper fumbled. The other was a well-directed header from about 8 yards. > > He might be limited, but he does what he does. And defenders absolutely > hate playing against him. > > M > > > >>> Apparently the goals were >>> tap-ins, one which keeper should have saved. Still credit to him for >> using >>> his limited capabilities to the hilt.<< > > _______________________________________________ > Leedslist mailing list > Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > To unsubscribe, email [email protected] > > PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate
