That would be me Rich (as you know) and on what I've seen of him so far that would be my assessment. This is based on a limited number of games so it was a bit premature for me to come up with that assessment and it was after one of his subs appearances where he came on and id nowt. I was probably pissed off. However, he hasn't had the opportunity to play centrally with Diouf and so has been pushed wide and also his runs will have been limited by having the statue up front. I might have said get rid but if it was a choice between getting rid of Becchio and Varney then there's only one option for me. If he's shown he can run up front for me that's a massive improvment , I just hope we now don't regress.
________________________________ From: Richard Naef <[email protected]> To: 'leeds list' <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, 31 October 2012, 9:51 Subject: Re: [LU] Soton report >> >>SNIP >>Varney should keep his place up >>front for Friday night - he won more headers than Becchio normally does, was quicker and more mobile, and can >>beat a player and cross a ball SNIP >Didn't one of our Listers suggest this in an email a few days ago? Don't be shy David well all know it was you, however but someone said on the 20th October; " Varney - get rid." _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate
