On 27 Feb 2013, at 11:36, Paul Cundell wrote: >> I go to the hustings. Have you ever been > > LMFAO - now who's making assumptions - card carrying member for 30 years, > canvassed, doorstepped and demonstrated. > Why would you support candidates who you aren't going to vote for - is that > so you can say I didn't vote for them when they f it up?
WOULD THAT BE THE LABOUR PARTY THEN ? As stated I have never found a candidate whose views match my own (in public) so I have not voted. When I do I will….for that I may have to stand > >> I simply cannot bring myself to vote for Sir John Stanley , he is not > right wing >> enough, so I abstain. > > You said you never voted and never will. I wil on Europe or if there's someone with adequate appeal in my constituency > That implies it wouldn't matter if > Mussolini was standing, you wouldn't vote for him. No I would not vote for Benito or Adolf. > Now you're trying to > claim that your failure to take an active role in society is some sort of > justifiable abstention. I do take an active role in society. I just don't vote for those I do not support. > Has he always been your candidate? Why not stand as > an alternative? Drop Nick Griffin a line I'm sure you'd be welcomed with > open arms, Ouch. We are considering file;ding a candidate at the next election. It will not be me , it will be another "offended of Tunbridge Welles" > >> As I want grammar schools Im actually in favour of council taxes being >> increased ! >> I want my local services and Im very happy to pay. I use the mobile > library a lot >> and my bin gets empties and the potholes are filled. No complaints at all >> Tonbridge and malling are wonderful > > And you do what about it? You don't even vote to make sure it continues. I may if there were a risk to services, or a risk that there would be criminal levels of overspend….see Labour > You don't even believe that the people who provide the services should be > rewarded adequately. It is all subcontracted out down here. If the bin men are share holders or can participate via an ESOPS scheme Im delighted for them > They aren't taking any risk so they don't deserve any > reward, do they? They may well be taking capital risks if they invest in their own company. Ill ask the bin men next time they come ... > >> My other half works for the NHS. Damned hard. I just believe that the > budget >> needs to be reined in. I se no point in giving ninety year olds their > second hip >> replacement. > > Daily Express sensationalism - take a hypothetical nonsense story and make > out it's fact. I can give you dozens of them ! I hear things most evenings form an NHS quack > For every sensational waste of resources story, I'll give you a Fred Godwin, > Starbucks, Amazon - all who get huge rewards for hedged risk. The pay off he got at RBS was obscene. Starbucks , Amazon and US corporate who use trust law and offshore entities are a disgrace. This is not hedging, they are simply exploiting loopholes. They should pay tax in the country that they earn the revenue. > >> The NHS has hits merits and its problems. I choose not to use it , be > don't make >> me a pariah for that choice ! > > Never said anything of the sort, you've obviously got a guilty conscience - > if the cap fits though….. I pay for the NHS but in the event that Im ill I want to get better.QUICKLY, > >> Tax, I think that the 50p rate was unfair and this had ben cut to 45. A > step in >> the right direction. many people I know just left the country and took > their >> business with them. > > I think it was perfectly fair, it was only 50% on the bit earned over £150k, > but note how the rich can leave the country whilst the poor are stuck with > the mess the rich have left. The mess created by a decade of socialist squandering billions The poor have passports, they go on lots of foregn holidays Even if you leave unless you take up residence an damage to obtain overseas domicile you or your estate will always be subject to UK tax > >> Do you wish t make any more errors of judgement ? Aren't you mission > Jeremy >> Kyle or something ? > > Not too sure what Mission Jeremy Kyle is, but the errors of judgement are > all yours. > > Oh and I'm glad Fred Godwin lost everything - oh, wait on though, £345K a > year pension for destroying the world's biggest company?!?!? Is that really > risking and losing everything? > Fred…it iOS a fiasco…we are agreed _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] MARCHING ON TOGETHER
