Bill, As I have previously mentioned, it is standard practice, or at least the most common practice, to record the address as that at the time of the event. I have, for example, in my records, Saddleworth, Yorkshire, England and Saddleworth, Lancashire, England both locations being the same but after a shift in the county boundary. Both are correct at their respective times.
I have a note to say they are the same place. I agree that it might look messy, but it is accurate, and as far as I am concerned that is the important point. Ron Ferguson _____________________________________________________________________ New Tutorial: Embed a Blogger RSS feed on your webpage http://www.fergys.co.uk/ View the Grimshaw Family Tree at: http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/ For The Fergusons of N.W. England See: http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ _____________________________________________________________________ ---------------------------------------- > From: whbosw...@gmail.com > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Moving Street Addresses and Location Names from > Location > Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:23:08 -0400 > > That's what I'm thinking. It's best to use the original address not the new > one like FTM wants you to do and I never did that. Because you will need > the original address for searches. Who really cares what's there now? At > least I don't unless I want to do a before and after. > > I just have a lot of addresses that have SW and NW (examples) for the same > street number and name. I'm very hesitant to change them because they are > listed that way in records. DC streets always were a mess and still are. > > I'm not going to convert my addresses in the Place list to exclude street > numbers and names to just city and state. To me that is not useful. > > -----Original Message----- > From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com]on > Behalf Of Art Seddon > Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 11:52 AM > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Moving Street Addresses and Location Names from > Location > > > Bill, > > An entry like this: > 3553 SW Adams Street, Peoria, Peoria, Illinois, USA > will take you directly to the location that I used to live at in the 1930's. > It wont show the house, because it don't exist any more, and your notes can > show name changes. The street was called S. Adams then. > > Art Seddon > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: William H. Boswell > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 3:26 PM > Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Moving Street Addresses and Location Names from > Location > > > ks for the tips. I really don't like the mapping feature anyway > because, as you said, you can't plot the entire house number and street. I > really don't care about the city unless to just verify that it ever existed. > I am not going to move the addresses, but already moved a few cemetery > names--one for more than 200 people buried there. > > _________________________________________________________________ View your other email accounts from your Hotmail inbox. Add them now. http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/167688463/direct/01/ Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp