[email protected] wrote: >> I am using Thunderbird on WinXP and have messages sorted by thread. The >> messages from the new list address sort perfectly, under the correct OP >> and in the correct order. > > I did not say that they wouldn't appear to sort correctly in any > particular email client, especially with so few messages having been > posted thru the new server/list to date. I said that they will probably > default to sorting by Subject (and Date) since the msg that In-Reply-To > (and/or References) refers to doesn't exist on your machine. This could > lead to incorrect threading, especially as the number of messages from > the new server accumulate on your machine. If you don't keep LUG posts > around for very long, and your email client is one that threads by > Subject/Date as a last resort, odds are you probably will never see a > problem. > > I use Agent as an email client. If I turn off "Enable Threading by > Subject", msgs from the new server don't get threaded at all because the > headers necessary to properly thread the msgs are unusable. Msgs from > the old server do get threaded properly with this option turned off > because the old server served headers that could be used. > > I was just trying to send a heads-up to the list. > I know. And I was just adding some more info.
-- Gene Y. http://myyoungs.atspace.com/index.htm Researching Young, Zies, Harer & Cox with Legacy Family Tree Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
