'...over-eggs the pudding...'.  I never heard that expression but I like it!!


Bob


On Jan 15, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Jenny M Benson wrote:

> On the whole I am a great fan of SourceWriter, but there are times when
> I feel it rather over-eggs the pudding!  Such as when it offers 4
> templates for recording genealogy reports:  Family Group Sheet, GEDCOM
> file, Pedigree Chart and Research Report.
>
> Largely because I've forgotten what I've used before, I've ended up
> using all 4 at random for all sorts of Reports - handwritten trees,
> Register Reports, FGS ...
>
> I'm not really sure why it's necessary to distinguish between them,
> anyway.  The main elements of the Citation for FGS, Gedcom and Pedigree
> Chart are all the same:  compiler, report title, supplied date &
> supplier, with just the option of adding some specifics in the case of
> the Gedcom.  With all 3 it is not possible to suppress Master Source
> Comments in Reports, which is *annoying*.  All three included "supplied
> by" or supplied [date] by" and then pick up on the compiler's or
> author's surname which is sometimes misleading and sometimes just wrong.
> (I have a Tree compiled by a deceased relative which was given to me by
> his son who does have the same surname, it might well have come from
> another member of the family with a different surname.)
>
> The Pedigree Chart citation is slightly misleading because it reads, for
> example, "Ralph Hare, "Rev Edward Hare Tree," supplied 2005 by Hare,
> [ADRESS FOR PRIVATE USE,] Wrexham, Wales" which may be a correct form of
> Citation (I don't know) but implies that the person who supplied the
> Chart is from Wrexham, Wales whereas it is me, the current owner, who is
> from there.
>
> As usual with Legacy, I suppose it boils down to "you pays your money
> (or not if you're using the standard edition!) and you takes your
> choice."  I have decided that the FGS output suits my needs and I shall
> use that for all manner of Reports.
>
> I'd be interested to hear the musings of other LUGgers on this subject,
> though.
> --
> Jenny M Benson
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>
>   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>
>   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
>
>   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>




Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Reply via email to