Once again the LUG has helped me find a better way. I have several "Modified Register" reports on family members that were sent to me by a cousin. These reports are like the Descendant Book Reports we have on Legacy. Some of them are more than 20 pages. I tried the Family Group Sheet template, but that does not allow page numbers to show on the Source list for an Individual. I have been using the Book template because I could easily cite the page number.
I've just tested and determined that using the Artifact template allows for this. It's actually called "Item of Interest," but I don't see why putting the page number wouldn't work? Any thoughts? Dede Holden P.S. Is "over-eggs the pudding" something like "too much sugar for a dime"? That was one of my grandmother's favorite expressions. And, in Jenny's defense, my mother's pudding recipes all call for eggs. On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Deborah Trounstine <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thank you, Charles. > That is a great idea and I'm going to change the few I have to that > designation. > Deborah > > Charles Apple wrote: > > Jenny, > > > > I just ran an example on my Test database using the Pedigree template and I > > can now see what your concerns are. > > > > I did not run into this problem because, on page 142 of "Evidence Explained" > > by Elizabeth Shown Mills, Family Group Sheets, Charts, etc. are Artifacts. > > Based on this I used the, Artifacts > Privately Held, template for the > > Family Group Sheets and Pedigree Charts that I have received from others. > > > > Hope this helps, > > > > Charles > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jenny M Benson [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 6:19 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Genalogy reports - SourceWriter > > > > Charles Apple wrote > > > >> My understanding is that the "supplied by" or "supplied date" is for > >> the puposes of showing the Provenance of a particular record. > >> > > > > Oh yes, I have no problem with that at all. The two things I do have a > > problem with is that it some of the citations automatically assume that the > > Report was supplied by the Compiler and then put *my* residence so it reads > > as if that is the Compiler's residence. > > -- > > Jenny M Benson Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
