Is the Master Source also copied, or is it a shared in the database? If shared, you could use to produce the desired results.
The question then becomes why would one NOT want to go this route? IIRC, the examples and videos make use of very generic master sources (Missouri Birth Certs, California Birth Certs, Hawaii Death Certs, etc). So far in my DB it seems the Master Source entries are very small compared to the Detail Source entries. It seems to me that if the Master Source is shared, you could both reduce the size of the database as well as make maintenance easier by using Master Source records for more than very general source categories. Use the details for the one-offs. I've got to be missing something, what is it? On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Dennis M. Kowallek <[email protected]>wrote: > > My interpretation was that the OP was asking about "shared events". Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
