N 51.07677 W 1.48568

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 2:14 PM, CE Wood <[email protected]> wrote:
> From GENUKI:
>
> "KING'S SOMBOURN, a parish partly in the hundred of King's Sombourn, and 
> partly in that of Lower Buddlesgate, county Hants, 3 miles S. of Stockbridge, 
> its post town, and 8½ W. of Winchester.  The village, which is large, is 
> chiefly agricultural.  King's Sombourn is mentioned in Domesday Book, where 
> it is spelled Somberne Regis.  Prior to the Norman conquest it was part of a 
> demesne belonging to the crown, and now forms part of the duchy of Lancaster. 
>  John of Gaunt had a palace here, the site of which remains near the National 
> school.  A portion of the inhabitants are employed in the iron foundries.  
> The living is a vicarage* with the curacy of Little Sombourn annexed, in the 
> diocese of Winchester, joint value £696.  The church, dedicated to SS. Peter 
> and Paul, is an ancient edifice with a wooden tower containing four bells.  
> The register dates from 1762.  There is a National school for both sexes.  
> The Independents and Wesleyans have each a place of worship.  The President 
> and Fellows of Magdalen College are lords of the manor.  [Description(s) from 
> The National Gazetteer of Great Britain and Ireland (1868) - Transcribed by 
> Colin Hinson ©2003]"
>
> "Southampton, Hampshire [SU420130] is 11.8 miles (19.0 Km) SSE of Kings 
> Somborne, Hampshire [SU360310].  This is measured directly between the two 
> points 'as the crow flies' ignoring any geographical features such as rivers 
> or hills."
>
> Putting Southampton into the mix is confusing, but perhaps was done because 
> it is the closest large city to King's Sombourn.
>
>
> CE Wood
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ron Ferguson [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 6:38 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Some help from across the pond
>
> Jim Walton wrote:
>> I have a question about European locations, and England locations in
>> particular. I've lived in several countries so I understand that every
>> place is different, and no one way is better than another. They are
>> just all unique to the culture that developed them.
>>
>> I've found a site, http://www.gazetteer.co.uk that attempts to do what
>> I need, but it lists historic counties, administrative counties,
>> districts, unitary authority areas, police areas, and
>> country/region--more than I really need. Administrative
>> County/District and Unitary Authority are mutually exclusive and
>> appear to be political entities as does country/region.
>>
>> When I have a location such as Brooke, Kingsomborne, Southampton,
>> England I quickly discover someone has given me bogus information. I
>> did find a King's Somborne in county Hampshire, so I think I would
>> list this as King's Somborne, Stockbridge, Hampshire, England. I did
>> discover that King's Somborne is a parish in Stockbridge.
>>
>> So, am I correct in my thinking? This obviously doesn't fit the
>> pattern of city, county, state, country since England doesn't have
>> states or provinces, only counties. I would then want to enter some
>> place like Saint Peter, Leeds, Yorkshire, England as Leeds,
>> Yorkshire, West Riding, England except here I see two problems. No
>> parish, unless I want to consider Saint Peter as the parish, and I
>> have an extra county location of West Riding. Now I don't have a
>> pattern that would match up for a search. To do so I would have to
>> leave a blank field between Hampshire and England in my first example.
>>
>> Now, while I've totally confused myself, I hope I have been clear
>> enough that our friends from England will understand the issue and
>> perhaps give some clarification.
>
> JIm,
>
> Basically what you are doing and the way you are constructing your locations
> is correct. You are right in thinking that England, all the UK and Ireland
> for that matter, does not fit the four field convention and the attempt of
> that convention to make the English locations fit is simply wrong.
>
> Parsishes, there are two types - Ecclesiastical and Civil - they are not
> necessarily co-terminous and the boundaries, and names, may vary over time.
> Towns and Parishes may also change from one county to another over time.
> When I include a parish in a location then it is the Civil Parish and not
> the Ecclesiastic. Note also that Registration Districts for bmd's are an
> artificial construction invented for administrative convenience and need not
> have any relationship to anything other than themselves!
>
> Personally, I don't know Kingsomborne (not any variants) but would observe
> that Southampton is also in Hampshire, so you are likely to be on the right
> track.
>
> In a previous post, I have referred to my blog on our locations at
> http://bit.ly/Location_location_location_UK . This blog also contains links
> to two sites which give comprehensive details of the constructions of
> locations in the UK and Ireland.
>
> Ron Ferguson
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>
>   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>
>   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
>
>   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Reply via email to