There might be additional references to your person, but as they are not adding 
to the AFN, but are adding to the IGI, and they are about to launch a system to 
finally clean up the multiple almost identical versions of the same person, it 
actually depends what you did with it the first time. I went and found most of 
the records, (in the IGI) in the original sources.
They are always adding more names, so your dead-ends may have a new clue to 
find. When I am not locating new sources, I return to the FS to find what I 
missed on the cousins.
Your choice. Rich in LA CA

--- On Sun, 2/21/10, GeoSci <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: GeoSci <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcing FreeBMD and the IGI
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Sunday, February 21, 2010, 12:32 PM
> Speaking about all of this -- is it
> worth the time to do a second
> search of the IGI (automatic through LEGACY) after a year
> from your
> first?  Is that a database that changes much??
>
> Keith
> --
> Keith A. McKain
>
> Website: http://home.comcast.net/~geosci64
> Email: [email protected]
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Jenny M Benson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Ron Ferguson wrote
> >>Just a small point of difference! when I have a
> certificate I do not
> >>remove the FreeBMD details which contains the index
> to the document,
> >>nor do I add the inde3x detail to the certificate
> source details. The
> >>reason being that it is my belief that the source
> detail should only
> >>contain details which are on the document, and the
> index is not, and in
> >>my view to include it is incorrect. I am aware that
> inclusion is in
> >>line with Evidence Explained, but, in my opinion,
> that does not make it
> >>right.
> >
> > Good point!  I hadn't thought of that.  I am torn
> between an urge to
> > fill in every field just because it's there and an
> urge to "do it
> > correctly" but I think you might well change my
> habits.  (Again!)
> > --
> > Jenny M Benson
> >
> >
> >
> > Legacy User Group guidelines:
> >
> >   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> >
> > Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> >
> >   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> >
> > Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov.
> 21 2009:
> >
> >   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> >
> > Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> >
> > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>
>    http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>
>    http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21
> 2009:
>
>    http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Reply via email to