I'm confused now. We've been talking about using the Location field to hold detailed place information because the Address under the + button on vital events doesn't work, or is at least so limiting that it in practice, well, doesn't work. The purpose is that using the Location can be counted on to behave consistently in at least the majority of cases, if not all cases (various reports, queries, etc). It sounds like you are telling me to go back to using the the address field though? I've got to be missing something, but I'm not getting it.
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 1:22 PM, CE Wood <[email protected]> wrote: > If you have separate locations for each plot, they are distinct locations and > a report on one will not show the others. > > If you put the cemetery as an Event Address, not Location, you can and print > a list of all who are buried there. You can tag them or create a search list. > > You can print a list of entries in the Event Address List either all entries > or just tagged addresses (not tagged individuals). The options for this > report are many. > > > CE Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
