Sorry - yes, Basic Sources. Never used Source Override.
Descendant Narrative. Cheers Jan -----Original Message----- From: Connie Sheets [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, 27 May 2010 1:35 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] source citations in reports Jan, Are you using Basic Sources, or Source Writer?� Which report(s)? If Source Writer, after the first citation in some reports, only the Subsequent Citation (a short citation) will print.� That is by design, and is as it should be. If you have used a Source Override on a Master Source, details will (probably) not print. That is also by design (or, at least that was the design back in March, 2009 when this issue was discussed in detail on this list; I have not heard that it has been changed).� That design decision has never made any sense to me, and is the reason why I avoid Master Source Overrides. Connie --- On Wed, 5/26/10, Jan Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Jan Roberts <[email protected]> > Subject: [LegacyUG] source citations in reports > To: [email protected] > Date: Wednesday, May 26, 2010, 10:00 AM > You might be able to guess from my > recent questions that I am generating a > lot of reports at the moment and have come across what > appears to be another > problem.� I have noticed that some of my sources in > the reports do not show > the source details.� For instance, a Master Source is > 'Research of Another > (Email)'.� Despite having selected (in Options > > Sources) for the text and > details and comments to be printed all I am getting is > 'Research of Another > (Email)' in some cases.� Yet the actual source will > have in the Detail the > name and email address of the sender and date of the > email.� Sometimes I > will add the actual text to the Text Comments screen,� > but this detail > doesn't always appear in reports.� And yes, I have > selected 'Include this > Citation on Reports' AND 'Add this detail to the citation > on Reports'. > > For example, this particular source has a certificate > number in the Source > Detail box, but this is what prints: > > � � 32.� Extract of Marriage Register, > Extract of Marriage Register, Cit. > Date: 24 May 2010. > > Can anyone else verify that this happens to them too, or is > it just my > system?� Using 7.4.0.39. Deluxe. > > And while I'm at it - Tim from Support has acknowledged > there is a problem > with "Someone", but look what appeared today in a report: > > Edith Edith never married and had no children.� > Herbert W > > INGERSOLL [791] [MRIN: 264], son of James INGERSOLL [6095] > > It should read Edith married Herbert W INGERSOLL etc. etc. > > Cheers > > Jan Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
