On 2010/07/07 01:07, David wrote: > Clearly Mike, Legacy is not a Document Management System, but why > should it not be a complete package? Why should there not be a add-on > or companion program which neatly ties the management of genealogical > documents to the base program which maintains the genealogical > information gleaned from them. Who wouldn’t want a program which > simplified the maintenance of the thousands of documents we > accumulate. And Ron, if you are worried about the cost, as a > companion program, you wouldn’t have to buy it! Personally, I just > want Legacy to be the best package in the world. How's that for > arrogance?
Add-ons are fine, but this sort of discussion often descends into requests for addition functions that some people then turn into demands. Whilst requests for enhancements are all very well, there is a sizeable number of us long-term users that would much prefer to see some of the long-outstanding bugs fixed, before enhancements are considered. We would also, well, I would for one, like to see the program modularised so that we can pick and choose which functionality we want to use and thus control the size of the download. -- Regards, Mike Fry Johannesburg Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
