James,

I am, and always have been, a lumper. I had to make some concessions when
Legacy introduced the Source Writer (if I wanted to use it), but nothing too
drastic, and there is no way that I will ever be a splitter. BUT this suits
me, and I am not suggesting for one minute that others should change their
practice.

Taking for example a census, my Master Source is for the year of the census
and (since Legacy switched the Repository from the Detail to Master Source)
and for the same year one for each of the Repositories i.e. I may have two
Master Sources for the 1851 census one for Ancestry.co.uk and another for
Findmypast.com.

I source all my Events, such that a new name found on a census will have
that census as the source for the Name, and the same for every other piece
of information which I record from that census, such as Residence,
Occupation etc..

Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/

-----Original Message-----
From: James Cook
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 9:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [LegacyUG] What are the pros and cons of splitting or lumping
facts?

Not talking sources here.  I've not been consistent, and am working on
doing some cleanup of my data.  For example, it's important to me to
keep track at an event level of an individuals appearance on the
census register.  I use a census event, but a residence event would
serve my purposes just as well.  As long as I have an event every 10
years I can see in my time lines and such, I'm good.  The census can
give more information though, such as birth or alt. birth, name or alt
name, occupation, veteran status, etc.  Some times I've added separate
facts and sourced with the census record, other times I just add notes
to the census event.  This is true of various sources, I'm just using
census as an example here.

I'm leaning toward lumping what I'll call these secondary facts in the
notes going forward with my cleanup.  Before doing so, I was wondering
if I'd cut myself off from some useful ways to slice, dice, chop,
mesh, share, search or otherwise much with my data.  Maybe I'm not
seeing a downside here that I should be.

TIA




Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Reply via email to