On 11/05/2011 14:43, James Cook wrote:
> I'm thinking some experimentation is in order.  Perhaps if I reorder
> the citation list, move my best primary source to the top of the list
> for each data item I'd get better results when sharing the data.  Or
> maybe sources can be tagged at the individual level, providing a way
> to tag preferred sources per data item or something.

In his webinar Geoff mentioned the possibility of arranging your
Citations so that the "best" one(s) was/were at the top.  I wouldn't
want to do this myself because I like my Citations to show me (and
anyone else) my path of discovery.

For example, my first "meeting" with Mrs Smith might be in the 1861
Census, where I discover that Mr Smith had a wife named Joan.  That
leads me to a Marriage Index which shows that Joan's surname was Brown
and they married in the June quarter of 1956.  That in turn allows me to
acquire the Marriage Certificate which gives me the exact date of the
marriage and other information.

--
Jenny M Benson


Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Reply via email to