Personally, I hope that Legacy never becomes so rigid that we won't have the option to ignore standards if that is our wish or need.
-----Original Message----- From: Kirsten Bowman [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 9:31 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] webinar comment There's no question that genealogical practice recommends using the name of the place as it was at the time of the event (and in the language of the place, if you want to go that far). I'm just wondering how that and other location issues that Legacy allows will integrate with FamilySearch's goal to standardize data entry of locations. From an earlier response I gather that the standard can be ignored, but what's the use of a standard that is ignored--or does the standard perhaps somehow take into account the situations mentioned? Kirsten Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
