My sources are also grouped like yours and I am wondering the same thing
about Geoff's method.  One option would be to have three categories:
Locality, Surname, and "other".  the other could be prefixed with a symbol,
like an asterisk.

On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Kirsten Bowman <[email protected]> wrote:

>    Russ:
>
> Yes, that would work for some, but I have a ton of book sources like
> Savage’s _Genealogical Dictionary_ and _The Great Migration Begins_ that
> pertain to many lines as well as other miscellaneous source items.  I’m
> wondering if Geoff uses some device or prefix to keep non-location specific
> names (like his new Find A Grave source) from mixing alphabetically with
> others that are sorted by state and county.
>
> Currently my 600+ sources are grouped by entering “book,” “cemetery,”
> “birth,” “marriage,” etc. as the first word in the Source List Name.  This
> is OK, but it causes records from a single geographical location to sort
> into those several categories rather than being grouped by location and I’m
> wondering if Geoff’s system would work better—except I’m not sure about how
> he handles some of these details.
>
> Kirsten
>
>  *From:* my genealogy email <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Monday, October 31, 2011 8:29 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] Geoff: Source List Arrangement?
>
>   Kirsten,
> For published genealogies, family bibles, etc... I start the name of the
> master source with the Surname so that they all sort together, ie.
> “HALLADAY – Family bible of so in so Halladay by so in so”; “SMITH – GEDCOM
> of John Smith descendants supplied by James Smith, 12-20-2010”.
> Hope this helps.
> Russ
>
>  *From:* Kirsten Bowman <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Monday, October 31, 2011 2:07 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [LegacyUG] Geoff: Source List Arrangement?
>
>    Geoff:
>
> In your last “Watch Geoff Live” you mentioned having sorted your Master
> Source List by entering the location first in the Source List Name since
> that’s the way many records are found at Family Search.  I do like the
> concept of having, for example, all New York, Dutchess Co., birth,
> marriage, death records, cemeteries, newspapers, etc. grouped together in
> the Master Source List, but how do you handle things like published
> genealogies, family bibles, or the dozens of other things that might not be
> location-specific?
>
> Thanks so much for doing this series.  It’s very informative to see how
> you use Legacy and there always seem to be tips to pick up in addition to
> the main topic.
>
> Kirsten
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
> on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>


Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to