Hmm, interesting. The number of individuals and the number of families are the same in both files. However, the number of unique surnames is (old/new) 547/406 (a HUGE discrepancy), and the number of Master Source entries is (old/new) 82/81.
I will do some more checking. On 6/12/2011 7:52:59 AM, Dennis M. Kowallek ([email protected]) wrote: > On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 07:30:18 +1000, J Richard Nickel > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Other than the File Management routines, is there any other testing I > >can perform to 'prove' the original fdb? > > Do the number of individuals look OK? Maybe, after doing a backup on the > NEW .fdb, run a Legacy Check/Repair on it to see if it passes Legacy's > data integrity tests. > > -- > > Dennis Kowallek (LTools/Custom Programming) > http://zippersoftware.com/ltools/index.htm > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ltools > > NOTE TO LUG USERS: Use plain text if you want me to read your post. > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
