On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 09:00:33 +1000, J Richard Nickel <jrnic...@skymesh.com.au> wrote:
>Hmm, interesting. The number of individuals and the number of families >are the same in both files. However, the number of unique surnames is >(old/new) 547/406 (a HUGE discrepancy), and the number of Master Source >entries is (old/new) 82/81. That doesn't necessarily mean there is a problem. The Legacy export might not have copied Master * (anything) records to the new file if they weren't being used. Master Locations might also be fewer. A Check/Repair should tell you if there are any referential integrity problems in the new database. -- Dennis Kowallek (LTools/Custom Programming) http://zippersoftware.com/ltools/index.htm http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ltools NOTE TO LUG USERS: Use plain text if you want me to read your post. Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
