Alan, I get the same result in that the name of the partner is the first on the list (he has had 4 to date!). However, I do not think it is relating to the preferred setting as I have his current partner (the 4th) set as the preferred.
Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ -----Original Message----- From: Alan Pereira Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 4:20 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Calendar Creator Mike, bothe marrieages are in the correct order. The problem appears to be that the Knight marriage was set to preferred??? I though that preferred was to do with how you prgress through a pedegree tree and how you define your direct line. The surname by which a married woman is known should be by latest marriage date? I think this is a bug! Alan -----Original Message----- From: Mike Fry [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 20 February 2012 16:03 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Calendar Creator On 2012/02/20 17:43, Alan Pereira wrote: > Although these respective second marriages took place in 1997 and they > are still together, my cousin's second wife shows as surname Knight > from the first marriage in the Calendar Report. > Is this a known problem? Are the two marriages in the correct, date sequence? -- Regards, Mike Fry Johannesburg Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
