Alan, I changed the preferred wife to the 2nd and it made no difference. I wondered if it might be that he only married the first, but when I checked the only one which he didn't marry was the 4th.
I am rather reluctant to say it is a bug, as I have not used this function, so I do not know exactly how it should work or what I might expect. I haven't the time at the moment to go into it in detail, which would involve working through the help files and testing all the options until I am really familiar with the function. Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ -----Original Message----- From: Alan Pereira Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 7:23 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Calendar Creator Ron, Weard. I changed the spouse to preferred and it displayed with the correct surname. Can you try the same to see whether switching preferences on the spouse rectifies the problem? Let me know what happens and I will report it as a bug. Alan -----Original Message----- From: Ron Ferguson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 20 February 2012 16:58 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Calendar Creator Alan, I get the same result in that the name of the partner is the first on the list (he has had 4 to date!). However, I do not think it is relating to the preferred setting as I have his current partner (the 4th) set as the preferred. Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ -----Original Message----- From: Alan Pereira Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 4:20 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Calendar Creator Mike, bothe marrieages are in the correct order. The problem appears to be that the Knight marriage was set to preferred??? I though that preferred was to do with how you prgress through a pedegree tree and how you define your direct line. The surname by which a married woman is known should be by latest marriage date? I think this is a bug! Alan -----Original Message----- From: Mike Fry [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 20 February 2012 16:03 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Calendar Creator On 2012/02/20 17:43, Alan Pereira wrote: > Although these respective second marriages took place in 1997 and they > are still together, my cousin's second wife shows as surname Knight > from the first marriage in the Calendar Report. > Is this a known problem? Are the two marriages in the correct, date sequence? -- Regards, Mike Fry Johannesburg Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
