On 28/05/2012 15:11, William (Bill) R. Linhart wrote: > As a result of the JPG suggestion I wanted to see just how much > storage I could save by converting the images. > As an aside: I used FastStone Photo Resizer to create JPEG-90's using > the batch feature. It took 9 seconds to create the 13 JPGs. That > reduced the size of the 13 images by 96%! Comparison of the resulting > images appear to be very, very good. If enlarged to an extreme, I see > a slight degradation in image quality.
Unless *storage space* is at a premium it is not recommended to keep JPGs instead of TIFFs but to keep originals of all pictures as TIFFs and make a JPG copy for use within Legacy. (You may be keeping both, but thought I'd clarify this for the benefit of those who didn't know.) -- Jenny M Benson Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
