Why would you want to do it the other way which requires two complete cycles (ie link father then link mother) where as if you have the mother and father showing then you can link an existing person as a child with only one cycle.
From: Pat Hickin Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 1:24 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Adding existing parent problem Yes, I know I can do that. But I still think it should be easier than it it to do it the other way round. Thanks, Pat On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Mary Moyer <[email protected]> wrote: Pat Add the existing child to the parents, not the parents to the child. Mary On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Pat Hickin <[email protected]> wrote: I repeatedly have this problem, or a variation of same. I just learned that a Mary Springer I have is a daughter of Nathan Springer and Hannah McDaniel, both of whom I already have & as married to each other. So I linked Mary Springer to existing Nathan Springer. I was not asked whether I wanted one of his existing spouses to be Mary's mother. But I did link her to an existing person, namely Hannah McDaniel. I was told Hannah was already Nathan's husband and I was asked if I wanted to link her in again. Well, I didn't want to do it again, but there was no option just to choose her, so I said "Yes," thinking I could just merge the two Hannahs. Now I am showing Nathan with two Hannahs (as well as 2 other wives) for a total of 4 wives. Both Hannahs have the same RIN and (I suppose for that reason) Legacy won't let me merge them. Both Hannahs have the same children & step-children. The only way I can tell them apart is that the original Hannah has a marriage date of 1776 and the 2nd has no marriage info. Hannah is shown as having 2 husbands, both named Nathaniel Springer, both with the same RIN.. I tried deleting the Hannah without a marriage date, but all it did was to change both Hannah McDaniels to Unknown! So I still have Nathan married 4x -- to 2 Unknowns, one with no marriage date; one with a marriage date of 1776. I tried to delete the Unknown w/o a marriage date and was asked if I wanted to unlink Nathan from his child Mary!! Why was that relevant?? I would have said "No," but I was not offered that option! I could simply choose among "Yes" "Cancel" "Zoom" and "Help." "Help" did not offer any way to keep Nathan linked to daughter Mary!!! So I chose "Yes (unlink Nathan from his daughter Mary)." I now attempted to edit the "Unknown" wife whom he married in 1776 by clicking on the empty wife screen. The box asking me to choose between existing person and new person had an option (already checked) to add this person to the current marriage (fine) so I then clicked "link to an existing person." But Hannah McDaniel had totally disappeared from my name list although I had only deleted the Hannah without a marriage date. Fortunately, I had no information entered for either Hannah except the dom for the original so I was able to re-enter her name easily enough. Daughter Mary of course was no longer listed as a child but I was able to link her back in. Can someone explain to me why Legacy makes it so hard to link an existing child to an existing couple? Or tell me how to do it easily? Thanks! Pat -- Russell G. Strong P. S. Check out Legacy Family Tree today! This full featured genealogy program can be downloaded FREE at http://www.legacyfamilytreestore.com/Articles.asp?ID=133&Click=1114 Oh so many branches and not enough time to check out all the roots!!!. Check out my Genealogy Pages at http://www.rgstrong-genes.com . Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
