The GUI is Legacy's trademark, IMO, and it is what I like best about
Legacy. It shows 3 families at once in relationship, not just a list of
names.  One has to bring up an editing screen to change anything, but
with others, one has to move to a families view to see the result.
Each program has features which appeal to its followers.

But Rich specifically asked about updates to the website creation
feature, which I don't use anyway.  The question probably should go to
the company, not to a users' list.  It is the kind of announcement that
could be put in a blog.

Doug,
Indexing for http://www.ryersonindex.org/

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:38:11 +0000
Ronald Bernier <[email protected]> wrote:

> Mike,
>
> I'll take a look at Legacy 8 if and when it is released, but I have
> already started the migration of my data to a program which I feel
> is/has outpaced Legacy's innovations (which have become very stale).
>
> I'll give Legacy points for their reports, but Legacy's GUI is
> definitely outdated.   Legacy hasn't really offered any innovative
> ideas for quite some time.  They touted version 7.5 as if it was a
> great improvement/upgrade - basically 7.5 added Family Search
> capabilities which some folks are/were interested in, but many are
> not.  Of course (through no fault of Legacy's) most folks haven't
> even been able to make use of the Family Search capabilities until
> very recently.
>
> If you look at the various software reviews/comparisons, you will
> notice that Legacy still has a good rating, but they have definitely
> lost ground.
>
> Bottom line, no need for me to develop patience for an eventual
> upgrade that I really don't expect to offer any substantial
> enhancements/innovative ideas.
>
> Ron Bernier
> Woonsocket, RI
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Fry [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 9:15 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Future updates
>
> On 2012/11/21 14:59, Ronald Bernier wrote:
>
> > with all due respect, you are entitled to your opinion, but there
> > are some of us who are interested in learning if a new release is
> > imminent, or if there are new improvements on the horizon.  If you
> > are not interested in this information, that is all well and good,
> > just delete any related emails.  You keep saying the release of
> > version 7 was a problem - again, many of us disagree with your
> > assessment.  I mean no disrepect, but everytime someone asks a
> > question along this line, you send the exact same response word for
> > word.
>
> I beg to differ. The release of version 7 was a shambles. Millennia
> made the mistake of raising expectations and then couldn't deliver on
> the several dates that they proposed. This led to a furore within
> this group, with a lot of people just asking "When", "When", "When"
> and displaying a lack of patience because of their raised
> expectations.
>
> The correct way of handling future releases, and Millennia is not
> Apple or Microsoft, is not to make sound until there's something
> concrete in the pipeline. And even then, the announcement should only
> mention a date that can be met with 100% certainty.
>
> Until then... you'll just have to develop some patience.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Mike Fry
> Johannesburg (g)
>
>
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Reply via email to