It is possible to run two versions of Legacy on the same machine, just install the second as "Legacy New". You are correct in saying that you would have to maintain two databases, especially if their structure has been changed following an update. --- Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk GOONS #5307
"CE WOOD" <[email protected]> wrote: > >This is helpful as many of us buy ancillary programs that work with the >current Legacy version. If a new one is coming, we may hold off buying until >the ancillary program will work with the new Legacy. Wish there were a way to >run two versions of Legacy, because then one could still use the ancillary >programs until those have a version to work with a new Legacy version. Sadly, >once you convert your data to a new version, even an update, it no longer >works with the previous version or prior update. That means entering new data >twice, once in the older version and once in the newer version, assuming one >could have two version on one's computer at the same time. CEFrom: >[email protected] >Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:36:19 -0700 >Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Future updates >To: [email protected] > >Yes, we've got a lot of great things coming. No, I'm not going to give any >hint of a timeline. We've learned from that. Programmers are working 18 hours >days right now for us. They've been stuck on properly implementing a major new >feature, but it's getting there. I'm excited about Legacy's future and feel >you will be too. > > >Thanks, Geoff RasmussenMillennia >[email protected] > > > > > >On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Tessa Keough <[email protected]> wrote: > > >I remember the version 7 release (although not at traumatized as some > >Legacy users). I do think that with the advancements by other > >genealogy programs (most recently Ancestral Quest and RootsMagic), it > >would be nice to have some general idea regarding a newer version of > >Legacy. I think we all know that something is in the works - It would > >not require a date certain and it would not require the list of > >features, but it would be nice to know if we can expect something in > >the near or far future OR if we should be looking at other programs. > > > >I appreciate the great features in Legacy and realize that we have had > >some features that others are just now getting BUT there were some > >very interesting features introduced by others. I would like to know > >if Legacy is going in that direction or if I need to spend some time > >playing with other programs to get features that would be helpful to > >my research and publishing. There is a lot out there and we do know > >that these programs all try to provide the bells and whistles. I think > >this is a simple request - are significant improvements in the works > >or not? And if there is not "something concrete in the pipeline" now > >that pretty much answers my question. > > > >Tessa Keough > >Guild of One-Name Studies, No. 5089 > >Legacy Virtual Users' Group > >One Place Studies - Plate Cove, Newfoundland > > > > > > > > > >On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Don Hendershot > ><[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> I disagree with belaboring a negative assessment of Milleniums' > >> performance; especially at the Legacy 7.5 price point! > >> > >> Millennia does an excellent job in a small niche market with a steep > >> middle-managent learning curve and with pretty limited resources. > >> > >> I expect some hickups, as long as it doesn't become the norm, and I want > >> to make sure I always give credit where credit is due. > >> > >> Legacy 7.5 is a very good product at a very good price! I wouldn't > >> hesitate to buy it again right now. > >> > >> ~Don > >> > >> > >> On Nov 21, 2012, at 7:15 AM, Mike Fry <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > On 2012/11/21 14:59, Ronald Bernier wrote: > >> > > >> >> with all due respect, you are entitled to your opinion, but there are > >> >> some of > >> >> us who are interested in learning if a new release is imminent, or if > >> >> there > >> >> are new improvements on the horizon. If you are not interested in this > >> >> information, that is all well and good, just delete any related emails. > >> >> You > >> >> keep saying the release of version 7 was a problem - again, many of us > >> >> disagree with your assessment. I mean no disrepect, but everytime > >> >> someone > >> >> asks a question along this line, you send the exact same response word > >> >> for > >> >> word. > >> > > >> > I beg to differ. The release of version 7 was a shambles. Millennia made > >> > the > >> > mistake of raising expectations and then couldn't deliver on the several > >> > dates > >> > that they proposed. This led to a furore within this group, with a lot > >> > of people > >> > just asking "When", "When", "When" and displaying a lack of patience > >> > because of > >> > their raised expectations. > >> > > >> > The correct way of handling future releases, and Millennia is not Apple > >> > or > >> > Microsoft, is not to make sound until there's something concrete in the > >> > pipeline. And even then, the announcement should only mention a date > >> > that can be > >> > met with 100% certainty. > >> > > >> > Until then... you'll just have to develop some patience. > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Regards, > >> > Mike Fry > >> > Johannesburg (g Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
