Yours is an interesting approach I’d have to admit, but it also has it 
fallacies. Under your method, you get a weird looking name, “Johanna Maria 
‘Anna’ Schamper” which was never her name…only in your mind. What I mean by 
that is you’ll never find any documents using that name. Her name was either 
Johnanna Maria Schampers OR Anna Schampers and never a combination. Another 
fallacy with your method is that you leave the impression or either two first 
names, two middle names, or in certain Latino cultures, two surnames. Using the 
Legacy supplies AKA entry, her actual name is not left to interpretation.



Brian in California







From: Roland Rhoades [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 2:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Duplicate search



This brings up another issue with Legacy. I NEVER use their aka names box 
because then you get that weird sentence "Another name for Johanna Maria is 
Anna." I'd enter the name as Johanna Maria 'Anna' Schampers and then I can also 
see it immediately in Family View and the name index without looking at Notes.



Roland Rhoades

Maine Families Genealogist

www.RolandRhoades.com

[email protected]

2010: 30 Years as a Genealogist






Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to