Everything mentioned are all valid points.  I have tried quite a few of
the different genealogy
programs.  Personally I have found Legacy the easiest as far as data
entry goes.  It also has a
larger suite of 3rd party tools that support it.  Unfortunately I
dislike their reporting of data.
That is why I use a different reporting tool (not a Legacy add-on). It
shows occupations along
with everything else imaginable.  If not, they are open to additions in
a timely manner.  (if reasonable
we are talking days!!)
Legacy should really try harder to keep up.


On 4/30/2013 4:24 AM, Ron Bernier wrote:
> Larry,
>
> What you are describing is already available in RootsMagic and The
> Master Genealogist.  It is called a sort date.  This is exactly why I
> have said on more than one occasion that Legacy is outdated/behind the
> times.  Legacy used to be an excellent program.  Unfortunately,
> Millennia doesn't seem to be the least bit interested in staying on
> top.  They are falling further and further behind their competition.
>
> Ron Bernier,
> Woonsocket, RI
>
> On Tuesday, April 30, 2013, Larry wrote:
>
>     Jenny,
>
>     I raised that same issue. I have recently been thinking about this
>     issue of showing events in reports. My thought so far is that
>     events do have dates associated with them, although we may not
>     know the date(s).
>     For practical sorting reasons I believe it would be necessary to
>     have what I term a "Pseudo Date". This would allow an event to be
>     displayed in a timeline in a "user assigned" or approximated
>     position rather than at the top of a list by default.
>     Here is a simplistic example to illustrate this. If I were to use
>     a Burial Event to show the cemetary information, I most likely
>     don't know the date. To prevent this from appearing at the top of
>     a chronological listing, ie., before they were born, which is
>     obviously absurd, I would use a Pseudo Date following the Death
>     Date to place it in correct sequence. This Pseudo Date could be
>     set to invisible so it wouldn't show on a report giving the false
>     impression that it is a known date.
>     A Pseudo Date could also be useful in sorting children. I know
>     Mary to be the third child but have no Birth Date, for example.
>
>     I am planning to offer this as a suggestion to Millennia. What are
>     your thoughts on this idea?
>
>     Larry Lee
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ron Bernier
> Woonsocket, RI
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree)
> and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to