It does, and thank you. I like the tag idea and will probably try that. I hope to end up with all those folks whom I have not verified with documentation not printing, if I can construct a report which will give either option, i.e. - print the unverified folks, or not print the unverified folks. I wonder if there is an option to print or not print based upon tag number?
Sometimes I hope for too much from the program. That may be the case here Thanks again. Jane On 8/26/2014 5:24 PM, Wendy Howard wrote: > I can think of several ways to handle this just off the top of my head... > > But primarily, my sources tell me who I've delved into, and who is > simply garnered from another's family tree, if I want to check on that. > If the source is only another person, then I've not sighted any > documents to prove what they told me. > > You could use a specific Legacy tag to indicate the people who need > closer inspection/investigation. When you've taken those steps with a > tagged person, remove the tag. You can always create a fresh list of the > people with that tag by searching on it, so it will not matter if you've > made other searches in the meantime and lost the previous list. > > You could make a new event for this purpose, and add it to everyone you > want to investigate at a later date. They can be found quickly with a > search for that event. You can make that event show in Family View as > one of the five fields displayed for the couple in the middle. > > You could put a note in one of the Note fields. > > This should give you some food for thought. :-) > > Wendy > > > Jane Sarles said the following on 27/08/2014 05:06: >> I know that I have seen messages on this list from people who add people >> who are possible, but not yet documented. I know it is not top-drawer >> acceptable to pros but I am only a small=time blunderer who is trying to >> gather family history. So, could I have a recap from those who make >> some notation or tactic to give those people who are suspected to >> belong, but not quite certain? >> >> Thanks to all of you who work to help those of us who struggle. >> >> Jane Sarles > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp > Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on > our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp > > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
