Hi Jane, You can't choose to omit a tag group from a report - but there is a way.
This is a case for one of the privacy options. Just mark these people Invisible on their Individual Information Sheet you'll find a Privacy Settings button. You could customise Family View so that this shows instead of the default Cause of Death. You customise Family View by right clicking on a label and then click the button with 3 dots next to the field you want to change. Look for Private in the list. When running a report you can override the Privacy options which by default don't include Invisible people when you wanted a report for yourself. Cathy Jane Sarles wrote: > > It does, and thank you. I like the tag idea and will probably try that. > > I hope to end up with all those folks whom I have not verified with > documentation not printing, if I can construct a report which will give > either option, i.e. - print the unverified folks, or not print the > unverified folks. I wonder if there is an option to print or not print > based upon tag number? > > Sometimes I hope for too much from the program. That may be the case here > > Thanks again. > > Jane > > > On 8/26/2014 5:24 PM, Wendy Howard wrote: >> >> I can think of several ways to handle this just off the top of my head... >> >> But primarily, my sources tell me who I've delved into, and who is >> simply garnered from another's family tree, if I want to check on that. >> If the source is only another person, then I've not sighted any >> documents to prove what they told me. >> >> You could use a specific Legacy tag to indicate the people who need >> closer inspection/investigation. When you've taken those steps with a >> tagged person, remove the tag. You can always create a fresh list of the >> people with that tag by searching on it, so it will not matter if you've >> made other searches in the meantime and lost the previous list. >> >> You could make a new event for this purpose, and add it to everyone you >> want to investigate at a later date. They can be found quickly with a >> search for that event. You can make that event show in Family View as >> one of the five fields displayed for the couple in the middle. >> >> You could put a note in one of the Note fields. >> >> This should give you some food for thought. :-) >> >> Wendy >> >> >> Jane Sarles said the following on 27/08/2014 05:06: >>> >>> I know that I have seen messages on this list from people who add people >>> who are possible, but not yet documented. I know it is not top-drawer >>> acceptable to pros but I am only a small=time blunderer who is trying to >>> gather family history. So, could I have a recap from those who make >>> some notation or tactic to give those people who are suspected to >>> belong, but not quite certain? >>> >>> Thanks to all of you who work to help those of us who struggle. >>> >>> Jane Sarles >> > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
