Barton Lewis wrote: > Thanks David and John, > > ... a search of the Archives did not turn up much in the > way of Oklahoma specifically, which is sort of its own > animal in terms of how to address place names that were > Indian lands originally....
Umm, well, but, uh, that is -- Oklahoma isn't/wasn't the only Indian Territory. Various places such as parts of Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois that I've worked with, were originally called Indian Territory. A little known twist that has misled numerous researchers, I'm told. Cheryl Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
