Thanks Brian, it may be another day or two before I can get back to
that.  Stay tuned ....


On 3/30/2015 1:56 AM, Brian L. Lightfoot wrote:
> Cathy, I'm sorry as I seem to have muddied the waters a little with my ending 
> remark about Comments from Master Sources being exported on GEDCOMS. Let's 
> leave those points for a different thread.
>
> Back to the problem that Genealogy Bob first brought up when he was surprised 
> about seeing these Master Source Comments included on the Footnote/Citation 
> as shown on the Assigned Sources window. You have brought up a very good 
> point that there are two radio buttons at the bottom: "Show Entire Source" 
> and "Show Source using Print Options". I believe that by default the "Show 
> Entire Source" is selected. Maybe what I didn't realize that Show Entire 
> Source is a preview of the footnote/citation temporarily ignoring the 
> checkmarks on the Comments  tab of the Master Source as to whether the 
> comments are to be included on reports or not. If one were to select the 
> other radio button to Show Source using Print Options, then the Comments from 
> the Master Source are not included if the Comments tab from the Master Source 
> has the checkmark to Not Include on reports. In other words, if the user did 
> not want the comments included on reports, then they are left out.
>
> So, Genealogy Bob, go back and look at the footnote/citation on the source 
> you described in your first post and then select the other radio button to 
> "Show Source using Print Options", and I'll bet you'll be happy. In other 
> words, your comments will not appear in that presentation of the 
> footnote/citation. If you want, toggle back and forth by selecting "Show 
> Entire Source" and then selecting "Show Source using Print Options" and 
> you'll see your comments appear and dis-appear (assuming you have your 
> comments selected to be NOT included on reports on the Master Source Comment 
> tab).
>
> Let me make that perfectly clear to all....in my opinion, this option about 
> including Master Source Comments on reports or not including Master Source 
> Comments on reports is working perfectly as designed in Legacy. And upgrading 
> to the latest version won't change anything about this feature. It has been 
> working perfectly for at least several versions prior to the current release 
> and probably back to the original release.
>
> Now, elaborating about my real concern...it's the very first option of Show 
> Entire Source. As should be now clear to all, Master Source Comments will 
> show up on the preview of the footnote/citation regardless of the choice to 
> include them on reports or not but ONLY when you have selected the first 
> option to Show Entire Source. Maybe that's a good thing to see or not, but 
> what we all want to really know is how the footnote/citation would look using 
> the Print Options selection. I'm even wondering why there is the first option 
> to preview the Entire Source when the user's selection to include certain 
> information or not would change the footnote/citation.
>
> Now here is the other part that makes this first option to Show Entire Source 
> seem like something is wrong somewhere. If the user were to go to Customize 
> 7.2 and remove the checkmark to Include Master Source Comments on reports, 
> notice that this is a FF setting which will apply to the current Family File. 
> Now, you'd think that these Master Source Comments would never be seen in a 
> footnote/citation yet when you go back again and highlight a source on the 
> Assigned Sources window, you'll see the same footnote/citation preview at the 
> bottom with the Master Source Comment included. You'd think that the 
> Customization 7.2 would make them invisible yet they still show up on the 
> preview when Show Entire Source is selected.  So in my mind, the option to 
> "Show Entire Source" over-rides the customization settings, sort of like an 
> all-powerful option.  I'm trying to grasp the intended use of the Show Entire 
> Source option especially when it can over-ride customization settings. I'm 
> not so sure that's what the programmers intended.
>
>
> Brian in CA
>






Legacy User Group guidelines:

http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com

Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to