Denise,

 

Well, Ancestry’s publishing of city directories and other books gives me 
“reasonable assurance,” as do (say) the US county websites which have their 
records online, or Google Books, or familysearch, where one can find digital 
images.   I guess if an individual had published an image on their personal 
website and that’s the only place it was, or otherwise could not be found, I 
might balk at citing it, but in general, I’m more interested in how to cite the 
material than questioning its provenance.  I do try and secure originals of 
primary sources; secondary sources, I’m not so finicky about, though I try and 
see them at my library, when I can.

 

Barton

 

 

 

From: LegacyUserGroup [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Denise Moss-Fritch
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2016 1:07 AM
To: 'Legacy User Group'
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] How to set up master source for City Directories in 
Legacy

 

Barton,

 

Not sure the following will provide any clarification. However, the National 
Genealogical Society publishes a series of recommendations across several 
topics. The “Guidelines for Use of Computer Technology in Genealogical 
Research” includes the following item:

 

“accept digital images or enhancements of an original record as a satisfactory 
substitute for the original only when there is reasonable assurance that the 
image accurately reproduces the unaltered original”

 

At least the item is something to think about. However, please remember that is 
the view of only one country’s national genealogical organization.

 

Denise

 

 

From: LegacyUserGroup [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Barton Lewis
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 9:43 PM
To: 'Legacy User Group' <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] How to set up master source for City Directories in 
Legacy

 

Well, I don’t know that I’d call it “useless.”  I think it’s actually 
interesting and worth discussing – but then I love the nitty-gritty of source 
citations.

 

ESM does not seem to have adequately provided for a category of book that has 
been photographed and published online, without having been “reprinted” in the 
traditional sense of the word.  In Section 12.60 of my version of EE (p. 698), 
she covers “e-books,” which she groups into 4 categories:

*         Audio versions of books issued in print;

*         Text publications solely released on CD-ROM or online;

*         Digital image editions of books previously published in print; and

*         Reformatted digital editions of books previously appearing in paper 
form.

The city directories example under discussion here seems to fall in the 3rd 
category.  But as Cathy has pointed out, when you go to this section in EE 
(12.79), ESM has classified such matter as “reprints.”   

 

I agree with Denise and don’t think the term “reprints” applies here.  I would 
propose using the Source Writer template for books, edited and bypassing the 
reprint option and choosing online image; I don’t see that you lose anything by 
bypassing reprint and think it’s more accurate.

 

Barton

 

 

 

From: LegacyUserGroup [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Cathy Pinner
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 11:17 PM
To: Legacy User Group
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] How to set up master source for City Directories in 
Legacy

 

What a useless discussion. It's Elizabeth Shown Mills that uses the term as 
shown in the quote I gave.

And yes in some discussion she also sees images as not the originals as they're 
subject to tampering (less so with images at reputable sites but easy if 
they're just emailed to you or photocopies etc) - which is why she makes 
extensive notes on what exactly she uses and the quality of the image etc.

I'm not that suspicious.

Cathy

Denise Moss-Fritch wrote:


Sorry Cathy, you are the one applying the term ‘reprint’ to these 
records, not me. Would that mean you define all records found online 
as ‘reprints’? Census? County record books? If so, than all records 
found online would be secondary not the original.

That would not be an record analysis to which I would not agree.

Denise

*From:*LegacyUserGroup 
[mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Cathy 
Pinner
*Sent:* Friday, October 28, 2016 10:03 PM
*To:* Legacy User Group <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >
*Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] How to set up master source for City 
Directories in Legacy

Your choice Denise

but I'd read on further and see that ESS calls them facsimile reprints 
or image reprints though in my edition she doesn't detail them online 
but rather on CD or microfilm.
"12.79 Reprints: Image Editions
Reprints that offer image copies of earlier publications are called
facsimile reprints (as opposed to facsimile reproductions of original
records, covered at 12.77). However, the modern terms image copy or
image reprint are better understood today."

Of course her caveats apply.

No doubt her webpages or the later editions cover online reprints.

I really don't care a bout exact ordering and commas etc so long as the 
source can be found. Of course it needs the online detail and the 
original publication detail.

That's what the SourceWriter reprint templates, which are all based on 
Evidence Explained, provid e.

Cathy

[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  
<mailto:[email protected]> wrote:


    Cathy,

    Yes, I am aware of the sample's format style. However, I am also
    aware
    that a digital image of an original book (City Directory or
    otherwise)
    is not a reprint of the original publication. A reprint would include
    both the original publication date and the date of the reprint. That
    is standard practice of the publishing industry. Even the
    publisher of
    a reprint might / pr obably would differ from the publisher of the
    original publication.

    As for SourceWriter, perhaps these differences is why I prefer not to
    use that option.

    Thanks for the comments,

    Denise



    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    *From: *"Cathy Pinner" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]%0b   
%20%3cmailto:[email protected]> 
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    *To: *"Legacy User Group" <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]%0b   
%20%3cmailto:[email protected]> 
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    *Sent: *Friday, October 28, 2016 8:42:41 PM
    *Subject: *Re: [LegacyUG] How to set up master source for City
    Directories in Legacy

    Denise,

    you've give n an example for a Basic Format - real book City Directory.
    An online version needs a layered source.

    Using the Books Reprint option is a way to get that and provides the
    necessary fields for the online site and the original.

    Do you know that when looking for a template in the SourceWriter you
    can enter the section number in the Find box?

    I just did this - and it gave the templates I pointed to.

    Cathy

    Denise Moss-Fritch wrote:


    Cathy,

    I am a bit hesitant with describing a digitized (online) City
    Directory as a ‘reprint’. Might I suggest you review section 12.75
    Reprints & Revisions in ‘Evidence Explained’ (p. 708-9)

    The book do es provide a sam ple source list entry for a City Directory
    as follows:

    Polk, R. L., compiler. Colora do Springs, Colorado, City Directory.
    Colorado Springs: R. L. Polk Directory Co., 1924, 1927, 1929, 1931.

    Typically the compiler and publishing information for a City
    Directory
    is found on the title / legal page of a directory, including the
    digital images.

    Denise

    *From:*LegacyUserGroup
    [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Cathy
    Pinner
    *Sent:* Friday, October 28, 2016 7:40 PM
    *To:* Legacy User Group <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]%0b   
%20%3cmailto:[email protected]> 
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    *Subje ct:* Re: [LegacyUG] How to set up master source for City
    Directo ries in Legacy

    Thomas

    A Historical City Directory seen via images online, is a book that
    has
    been republished online.
    So in SourceWriter start with Books and choose one of the reprint
    options and then online book for the Medium.
    If you want the full original publishing details, add them along with
    the original publication date.

    C athy

    Thomas Vilfroy via LegacyUserGroup wrote:


    The original message to the list is in the attachment.

    This action is required because of the DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy
    imposed by some email providers. Users who want to send messages 
    without conversion to attachments should use a different email a
    ddress
    for their subscription.

    Known providers for free email accounts whose emails do not require
    this conversion include gmail.com and hotmail.com. Many other email
    pr oviders will also work but you will have to give them a try.


    -- 

    LegacyUserGroup mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    To manage your subscription and unsubscribe
    http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
    Archives at:
    http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

-- 

LegacyUserGroup mailing list
[email protected]
To manage your subscription and unsubscribe 
http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
Archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to