Hi,
Heiko Jacobs wrote:
Rob Myers schrieb:
Creative Commons did put a mechanism in place with BY-SA 3.0 to
declare other licences "compatible" with BY-SA and allow derivatives
to be relicenced under them. But they haven't declared any compatible
yet.
So updating our 2.0 to 3.0 and then finding a licence compatible
with cc-3.0-by-sa would be a way to avoid all loss of data and problems
with asking all members and all other problems?
Then we should search a compatible way ...
This would require the cooperation of Creative Commons. They would have
to explicitly declare a database license as compatible with their 3.0
license. Since ODbL arose from an abandoned attempt by CC to find such a
license, I think it is unlikely that they would do that.
Bye
Frederik
_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
