On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar <[email protected]>wrote:
> You said, "Which means *all elements* of the produced work are under > BY-SA." > > This is already the invalid step in your "proof". If I license a Wikipedia > article under CC-BY-SA, that doesn't mean that the pictures in that article > have to be CC-BY-SA. If I license an album of songs under CC-BY-SA, that > doesn't mean that each song in the album have to be CC-BY-SA as well. > That's because a Wikipedia article (according to Wikipedia, anyway) and an album of songs (more clearly) is a "Collective Work" under CC-BY-SA. Are you saying that a mash-up is a "Collective Work" under CC-BY-SA? Is that a topic that's been discussed before on this mailing list?
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
