On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > For me, as a PD advocate, the more licenses you license the stuff under the > better as it will combine the loopholes of every single one. > > If, however, you intend to "protect" our data by putting it under a > share-alike data, then any additional license you add weakens that > "protection". Your suggestion would effectively kill the relatively strong > share-alike element of ODbL that requires people to share the database > *behind* a produced work, rather than just the work itself.
So why are you, as a PD advocate, in favor of the ODbL? That aspect of ODbL is particularly nasty, if in fact it is enforcible. Whether or not it is, once you throw the DbCL into the mix, I don't know. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
