> It is kind of unfortunate, because OSM as far as I am informed, wouldn't > be interested in the specific dataset (of real estate prices) anyway. > > If it's not the type of data that OSM would be interested in, then why doesn't it fall under the Collective Database Guideline? the non-OSM data adds a particular type of geometry or data for a primary feature that was not already present within a regional cut, and the added feature data includes no OSM data; Wasn't a major reason for that guideline to permit nonsharealike usecases where the data potentially subject to sharealike would not be useful to OSM anyway?
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
