Simon, > Gesendet: Montag, 16. Dezember 2019 um 13:33 Uhr > Von: "Simon Poole" <si...@poole.ch> > > Just to be clear: you asked a question on an unmoderated, publicly > accessible mailing list on which everybody can voice their opinions > however unfounded they are or not, and now you are unhappy with that you > got a cacophony of conflicting opinions, which is exactly what you > should have expected.
I was aware of this and just wanted to get a consensus by the data creators: the users. Looking at the opinion of the mass it shows me, that my approach of using OSM as a source of selecting the data doesn't seem to be fine. More of you are saying "share-alike", so I have to deal with this. Like I sad before: I would have been fine at attributing OpenStreetMap as selection. Now, I neither can use OSM data, nor add my dataset to yours. A lose-lose-situation :-( > The official guidance on geo-coding from the OSMF can be found here > https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Community_Guidelines/Geocoding_-_Guideline I think that is what Kathleen tried to explain, but got confused by others. I'm sad that paying a lawyer is more expensive than paying for other datasets :-) Regards, Matthias _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
