On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 12:14 AM, Edward K. Ream <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interestingly, the qt tree redraw is significantly slower than the > tkinter tree code; the qt unit tests take about 90 sec. longer than > the tk unit tests. So much for native widgets :-) Of course, a lot > of special-purpose work went into making leoTkinterTree.py fast, but > it does cast some doubt on the inherent superiority of C code... I don't really believe it's fundamentally slower - rather, there is something that is broken in the implementation (apart from it not having received significant optimizations yet, of course). You might want to run the unit tests in the profiler and compare tk and qt results. Creation of all 6000 nodes of leopyref took 0.5 seconds - I don't think Tk will fare much faster. -- Ville M. Vainio http://tinyurl.com/vainio --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
