On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Ville M. Vainio <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> can still fail if the gnx can't be found in the subtree being scanned
> >> (like we fail now when the position can't be found).
> >
> > Sure. Representation can't make up for truly missing data.
>
> Again, speaking too fast. I meant we should fail if we have 2+ nodes
> with same gnx ("in face of ambiguity, resolve the temptation to
> guess").
>
> Still - tnode uA's should remain the preferred uA approach.
Sounds reasonable. What would be a reasonable next step?
Edward
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
