On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Ville M. Vainio <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Edward K. Ream<[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> Again, speaking too fast. I meant we should fail if we have 2+ nodes > >> with same gnx ("in face of ambiguity, resolve the temptation to > >> guess"). > > > Sounds reasonable. What would be a reasonable next step? > > You'll add that functionality to archivedPosition and > resolveArchivedPosition ;-) > > I'd do it myself, but I'm probably done with coding today (it's late & > slept only ~ 4 hours last night, that's why my mails are gibberish > today). Or, I can add it tomorrow if you are busy w/ other defects. I'd rather you do this, when it is convenient for you. You understand the details; I do not. Edward --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
