On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Edward K. Ream<[email protected]> wrote:
> We can't abandon the pattern orientation of the jEdit pattern matchers > without abandoning all the benefits of having dozens of jedit mode > files. > Yes, in extremis, we could punt, and do everything over. But in my > mind, > this defines total failure. I think we could have both - retaining current code, while still attempting to simplify the situation for some cases (i.e. use different code). Therefore, we would keep the current colorizers while providing "optimized" colorizers for some languages (python/c comes to mind). For 4.6, I think we can just assume that the current functionality is as good as it gets in the short term - we just need to fix the problems with disabling the syntax highlighter altogether. -- Ville M. Vainio http://tinyurl.com/vainio --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
